Today, I asked Kathleen, my sensible dental hygienist, how the “dentist business” was going.
I honestly didn’t expect the answer I got — I assumed that folks’ teeth would be one of those “recession proof” things. At least regular check ups and cleanings.
Not the case: “It’s been different… worst recession I can remember,” she said.
According to her, my region’s dentists and their office staff are reporting “not even getting their co-pays”.
That’s not good — and for a multitude of obvious reasons — but here’s a different way to think of it:
For all the official economic stats out there, and specifically the “leading economic indicators“, those stats like the “Average weekly jobless claims for unemployment insurance” and the “The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index” that supposedly represent the trajectory of the economy, there’s probably not one that is as straight forward and tangible as the nascent one implied by my anecdote: are the folks in your town skimping on basic health maintenance?
I think it’s fair to say that it might be time to think about changing that phrase, “All politics is local”, to “All economics Is local”.
If we want folks to understand the state of the economy, why start with national, abstract measurements? Why not anchor it to the folks in your town?
Actually, I’ve been meaning to write about this concept for a while… Way back in 2009, I noticed that when I went to the bank I’d see a lot more people than normal with their change baskets at the counting machines — dumping change, waiting patiently, dumping more, waiting and then finally taking the paper print out to the counter.
I had the fleeting thought back then that it would be really interesting to see the data regarding the usage of those machines?
My thesis: you could gauge the anxiety or budget stress families were having in a region by measuring the frequency and volume of change redemption across banks.
Who ever thought the change in the couch could give you so much insight?